![notability meaning notability meaning](https://miro.medium.com/max/1400/1*e10zqgZ54dSdx_FpFzAK1A.jpeg)
The best test for this sort of relationship is to ask, "would a very short summary of the parent topic be expected to include the 'child' topic?" Even then, typically such subordinate topics are merged into the parent article unless (as noted above) size limitations make this option less ideal. Arrakis is the primary setting in the Dune universe).
![notability meaning notability meaning](https://thesaurus.plus/img/synonyms/778/notability.png)
![notability meaning notability meaning](http://www.macdrifter.com/uploads/2018/06/IMG_0512.jpg)
![notability meaning notability meaning](https://www.zhighley.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screen-Shot-2020-12-09-at-8.47.18-PM.png)
This is especially obvious in fiction where a fictional place may not be notable on its own, but might be the primary setting or character of a notable work of fiction (e.g. Notability of a topic can often carry through to key features of that topic. This is not to be confused with Notability is not temporary. Therefore it is a fallacy to declare that notability (or non-notability) is permanent. As well, a topic which was deemed non-notable in 2010, may become notable by 2015, when multiple, independent reliable sources significantly discuss the topic. Articles which were thought notable and suitable for inclusion earlier in the history of Wikipedia have later been deleted. Those standards are subject to change, as can be seen in a number of deletion debates. Wikipedia operates by consensus, and that process includes deciding what is and isn't suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia. Since consensus can change on Wikipedia, Wikipedians should not state that notability (or non-notability) is permanent. A topic's inclusion in Wikipedia is decided by a consensus of Wikipedians, nothing more and nothing less. The significance of coverage, reliability of sources and the independence of the sources are all issues which should be explored within a deletion debate, not simply contended by an or, and it is the debate which decides the notability of a given subject on Wikipedia, not an individual or. As the guidance itself states, notability is a presumption it is an assumption or supposition made with a degree of certainty, not an assertion of certitude. They should also not seek to stifle debate simply by declaring that notability is an objective fact. It is not helpful to simply declare a subject non-notable an or should express their opinion as to why the article is non-notable, referencing both the article contents and any relevant policy or guidance offered on Wikipedia. Rather, the contents and subject of the article should frame the debate, and arguments should be put forward relating specifically to that content and subject. Nevertheless, the criterion itself contains four subjective words, specifically "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Whilst guidance on notability is useful, it is intended as a rule of thumb, and not the only consideration in a debate. It is sometimes stated on Wikipedia that the primary notability criterion is not a subjective criterion. 3 Notability is not judged in isolation.Notability is not permanent–it can change. This essay argues that notability is not objective. Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity-although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject. Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by ors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. If you are new to Wikipedia, you will need to know that "notable" does not simply mean "noteworthy," which is a standard way that the term is defined by a dictionary. This essay makes four arguments about things notability is not. On the encyclopedia, the term "notability" has a specific meaning that differs from the regular dictionary definition. However, "noteworthy" does not mean "notable" in Wikipedia. This person seems noteworthy, as a statue was built in his honour.